The honest answer depends on three things, and none of them is which platform is better. It is what you sell, what you can film, and what you can afford to spend before you learn something.
This question gets asked as though one platform is winning and the other is finished. It is not that kind of question. Both platforms work in Pakistan, both have people making money on them right now, and the difference between an account that works and one that does not has very little to do with which logo is at the top of it.
What the platforms genuinely differ on is the kind of demand they create and the kind of creative they need. So the useful question is not which is better. It is which one suits what you sell and what you are able to produce every week.
Three tests, in order.
Meta is better at considered purchases. People scroll it slower, they read, and the format lets you explain something before you ask for money. If your product needs a reason — a size guide, a comparison, a before and after, a price that requires justification — Meta gives you room to make the case.
TikTok is better at demonstration. If the product is obvious in three seconds, if it does something visible, if the reaction is the sales pitch, TikTok will find people who were not looking for it. It creates demand rather than capturing it, which is exactly what you want for an impulse product and exactly wrong for something people research.
This is the test people skip, and it decides more outcomes than the product does. TikTok consumes creative. A format that works there works for a shorter time than the same idea on Meta, and the platform expects volume — filmed on a phone, edited roughly, published often. If you cannot produce several new videos a week, TikTok will be expensive for you regardless of what you sell.
Meta is more forgiving of a smaller creative library. A good static image or a single well-made video can carry an ad set for a long time, and you can get a readable result from a handful of pieces rather than a stream of them.
Pick the platform that matches your production capacity, not the one that matches your ambition. A great TikTok strategy you cannot feed is worse than an ordinary Meta account you can.
Be honest here. Not aspirationally honest — actually honest about who is holding the camera on a Tuesday afternoon when nobody feels like filming.
Both platforms need a certain amount of spend before the data means anything, and both will happily take a smaller budget and give you nothing readable in return. If your budget only supports one platform running properly, run one platform properly. Splitting it so you can say you are on both is the most common way small accounts waste their first month.
The number that matters is not your daily budget. It is how many results that budget can buy before you have to make a decision. If the answer is a handful, you are not testing anything; you are collecting anecdotes.
Add the second one when the first is stable and boring. That means a cost per delivered order you can predict within a reasonable range, a creative process that runs without heroics, and tracking you trust. Adding a platform to escape a problem does not work; the problem comes with you.
And if the answer to all three tests is genuinely unclear, that usually means the product is the thing to examine, not the platform. A product with enough margin and an obvious reason to buy tends to work on both. One without tends to work on neither, and the platform argument becomes a way of avoiding the harder conversation.
Bring your product, your margin and your budget to a call. If the answer is neither platform yet, I will tell you that instead of selling you a retainer.
I run paid campaigns on Meta, TikTok, Google and Snapchat for stores in Pakistan and for clients in the US, UK, Australia and the Gulf, and I have trained over 5,000 students across my programs. The arithmetic in this article is the same sheet I open before quoting any account.